The Faculty of Law at the University of Ottawa offers students both the largest concentration of health law professors and the broadest selection of health law courses in Canada. Some students come to law school with a health background or with an interest in health generally. Others discover their interest during their law studies. Either way, enrolling in the Option in Health Law allows you to showcase the array of courses in health law that you take during your studies. A certificate and notation on your law school transcript can be attractive to future employers. As well, the Option allows you opportunities to interact more closely with health law professors. The Option is available to students in the Common Law section.
For details on requirements and enrolment in the Option, please see the Health Law Option page at the Faculty of Law.
Deciding which law school to attend can be tough, because each one has its own merits and areas of specialization. For me, what tipped the scales was uOttawa’s Centre for Health Law, Policy and Ethics (CHLPE).
I became involved with CHLPE in 1L after applying for a Santeship: A program that allows first-year law students to work on health law-related projects with a professor in their particular field. I had the immense pleasure of working with Professor Jennifer Chandler, whose research focuses on the intersection between the law, ethics and the brain. I worked on a wide range of fascinating projects ranging from regulation of psychosurgery, to the impacts of neurological and mental disorders on culpability, to the Charter as it applies to Medical Assistance in Dying legislation. These projects opened by eyes to the limitless options one can pursue with a law degree and enabled me to discover areas I can envision myself practicing in.
Aside from the challenging and innovative work, I truly felt like I was part of a team and that I developed lasting relationships with the professors and other students at CHLPE. For example, because COVID prevented us from being able to celebrate being the first cohort to obtain the Option in Health Law, members of CHLPE took it upon themselves to throw us a virtual celebration. It is rare to be part of an institution that goes above and beyond for its members, but CHLPE exceeded all my expectations. The professors at CHLPE are invaluable mentors who display a genuine interest in your self-development and learning experience.
I feel incredibly fortunate to have been part of CHLPE, and I am confident that future students will feel the same.
Only certain courses are offered in each year.
For course availability and more information please go to:
Faculty of Law, Common Law Section course search engine
Faculty of Law, Civil Law Section courses page
Can only be taken for credit by 1L students but do count toward the course count for the J.D. Option in Health Law.
This course focuses on the impact of law on the health care we receive and in particular the impact of law (legislation, constitutional law, administrative law, international law, common law) in shaping Canada’s health care system. How do we decide what new services, drugs and technologies are publicly funded, and what are the legal avenues of appeal available to patients? How does the law contribute, at a systems-level, to ensuring the quality and safety of care delivered to Canadian patients? How and why has Canada’s health system failed Indigenous Peoples, and what role has the law played? What can the law do to improve upon wait times for care? Why does Canada not have a national insurance system for prescription drugs, long-term care, or dentistry and what can be done about these gaps in coverage?
Delving into these and other live debates, students will gain an understanding of the legal framework of governance for Canada’s health care systems, the impact of federalism on health care policy, the differing impact of the right to health and health care how across jurisdictions and how ultimately all of this shapes the care received by Canadians. Student will also learn the importance of the dynamic relationship between law and policy and how to apply public law principles through analysis of Charter and administrative challenges to the Canadian health care system (no pre-existing knowledge is assumed of the Charter or administrative law).
As the first objective, this perspective seminar is designed to introduce students to the various contexts for the use(s) of the knowledge of indigenous peoples and local communities relating to genetic resources (plants, animals and other biological materials) and aspects of Aboriginal environmental stewardship and biodiversity conservation in the biotechnology, medicine, pharmaceuticals, foods, agriculture, beverages, cosmetics, health, personal care products and related industries and in various forms of research and development. As a second objective, it introduces students to the international and local legal and policy spaces on how access to those genetic resources and associated indigenous or traditional knowledge is negotiated to ensure there is fairness, justice and equity for indigenous peoples, industries/corporations, researchers and all stakeholders. The third objective of the seminar is to assist students understand the intersection of various complementary and competing legal regimes including Aboriginal law, traditional knowledge, intellectual property and 'biopiracy', environmental, biotechnology and even constitutional law around the subject of genetic resources. Finally, through the thematic, students are exposed to relevant fora on access and benefit sharing to genetic resources and associated traditional knowledge such as the Convention on Biological Diversity, the Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit Sharing, the Food and Agriculture Organization and the World Intellectual Property Organization along with the local legal and policy contexts for Aboriginal rights and the ongoing Reconciliation initiative in Canada. All together, the seminar will enable students to have insightful perspectives and advantage to inform their choice and performance in related upper year courses.
Y.Y. Brandon Chen
The first-year thematic course is designed to allow first-year students to broaden their knowledge of a specific topic in law. In this particular thematic course, students will be introduced to Canada's immigration/refugee and healthcare systems, and examines legal, ethical and policy issues that arise when these two fields intersect. Canvassing both domestic and international law, including Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, Canada Health Act, and the International Bill of Human Rights, the course will consider such topics as public health related travel restrictions, medical inadmissibility, immigrant and refugee health care, medical tourism, and international migration of health care professionals. Through critical discussions of these issues, students are invited to explore how immigration and healthcare laws and policies contribute to social exclusion and inclusion, and how they affect equity both domestically and globally.
In this seminar, we explore how law can be used as a tool to empower people with disabilities and work for social justice on issues relating to disability rights. At the same time, we also consider the extent to which law is used to regulate the lives of people with disabilities. Students will be introduced to a variety of approaches to thinking about disability issues and the differences between impairment, disability and handicap through jurisprudence and other scholarly materials. Some of the topics that are covered include disability accommodation in the workplace and in the educational spheres, reproduction and sexuality, and the hotly contested issues related to the “right to die”. We also spend some classes on how disability law works in practice before courts, tribunals and arbitrators in Canada.
This course will explore a wide range of legal issues arising in health care settings. Traditionally, the physician-patient relationship has been the focus of health law. This course will cover legal issues arising from that relationship such as consent, professional negligence, and the regulation of health professionals. However, relationships and issues at the broader systems level are the subject of increasing legal regulation and health law scholarship. We will address such systems level issues as constitutional claims relating to access to and funding of health care, medical research ethics, and the regulation of pharmaceuticals. We will also discuss a number of selected topics including reproductive health care, mental health law and end-of-life decision-making.
This seminar will explore issues at the intersection of law, sexuality and gender in Canada. Although the legal production and regulation of sexuality and gender impacts everyone, the class will focus primarily, but not entirely, on its particular impacts on gay, lesbian, bisexual, trans, two-spirited and queer (GLBTTQ) people. The class will introduce various theoretical perspectives and will consider the legal construction of gender and sexuality in the judicial decisions, legislation and administrative rules that define and regulate gender and sexuality in Canada.
This seminar addresses the legal issues related to mental health, mental disability, and neuroethics in four parts.
(1) Mental health law in Ontario
The laws and procedures of involuntary committal and treatment under provincial mental health legislation, capacity and substitute decision-making. We also consider the intersection of tort law with mental illness.
(2) Mental disorder and criminal law
Mental disorder in the criminal justice context, including findings of fitness to stand trial, findings that a person is not criminally responsible by reason of mental disorder, sentencing options, mental health courts and therapeutic jurisprudence.
(3) Human rights and mental disability
Questions of human rights and social justice relating to mental health and mental disability, particularly with respect to discrimination and access to care.
(4) Emerging neuroscience, ethics and the law
This part of the course we consider the future, and look at how advances in the behavioural sciences are even now raising challenging questions for neuroethics and for the law.
At the heart of public health law and policy lies this basic question: to what extent can the state legitimately impinge on individual rights, in its efforts to promote or protect the health of the population? Controversies rage over public health policies such as proposals for a fat tax, banning super-sized portions of sugary or high-fat foods, reducing salt in our diets, elimination of tobacco advertising, GMO labeling, mandatory vaccinations (and alleged links with autism), fluoridation of the water supply, criminalization of HIV non-disclosure, scrutiny of individuals donating blood and ban on the sale thereof, gun control, safe-injection sites, the legalization of recreational marijuana etc. Areas of law engaged include statutory interpretation, criminal law, constitutional law, tort law, privacy law, and administrative law.
Those favouring a restricted role for public health speak of the importance of individual self-reliance, the problem of paternalism and the slippery slope of government intervention(s) that further erode individual liberties. Those in favor focus on improving the population’s health, the cost-effectiveness of deterrence over disease treatment, and the importance of promoting social justice and protecting the vulnerable both within nations and at the global level. In this course we will explore these conflicting views and their grounding in philosophical frameworks (libertarianism, libertarian paternalism, contractarian rights theory, egalitarian liberalism, utilitarianism, and communitarianism) and public health frameworks (police powers, human rights, civic models, harm reduction, precautionary principle, etc) and, in addition, consider the extent to which public health decision-making inculcates evidence about what works and doesn’t work. We will also explore the role of both domestic and international law in the formulation, execution, administration and frustration (through judicial challenge) of public health policy at national and global levels. These issues will be animated through case studies of, for example, different pandemics and communicable diseases, tobacco control and vaping, obesity control, decriminalization and subsequent regulation of recreational marijuana, blood safety, vaccinations, firearms control, and the opioid crisis. Students will develop a robust analytic lens for assessing public health law and policy, and hone their skills at forcefully advocating for or against particular initiatives.
This seminar will provide students with the opportunity to be exposed to cutting-edge problems at the intersection of the law and the realm of medical technologies. The seminar will use an approach by themes and will notably address the legal implications of emerging and transformative health innovations such as medical devices, digital technologies, drug development and the use of AI to improve the delivery of care. Students can also expect the course to cover medical research, health policy, and the regulatory trade-offs of expediting the approval of new medical technologies or drugs.
The course will involve interactive sessions with guest speakers as well as lectures by the instructor to spark debate and discussion on the legal, ethical and social implications arising from the topics discussed in class. This seminar is open to students interested in health law or technology, and no background or prerequisites are required.
COVID-19 has raised issues in all areas of the law—civil liberties, health, criminal, immigration, disabilities. This course will examine each of these issues and each class will feature a lecture and discussion with a different member of the Faculty of Common Law.
Individuals suffering from mental disorders have contact with and are impacted by the legal system on a a daily basis. This course examines our perceptions of those suffering from mental disorders and critically assesses how these perceptions influence how the legal system responds to their needs and issues. There will be a review of the historical development of legal procedures and substantive law to address mental health issues. There will be a comprehensive review of the evolution leading to the passage of Part XX.I of the Criminal Code, beginning with the seminal case of Daniel McNaghten. The creation of a civil mental health system in Canada will also be examined. The efficacy of the current Review Board system will be critically examined. The course will focus both on having students acquire substantive knowledge of historical and mental health law, as well as to assess how the mental health and legal systems can most effectively work together.
This course provides a basic overview of food law and policy in Canada. In addition to reviewing the primary acts and actors relevant to this area, this course surveys major topics covering all aspects of the food chain, from production to consumption. This will include topics such as agricultural law and policy, food safety, food and health labelling, marketing and advertising, public health, and the practice of food law in Canada.
In particular, we will tackle emerging areas such as food systems and sustainability, the new Food Policy for Canada, food security, food sovereignty and food justice; the social economy of food; the regulation of GMOs and other food innovations; food law and gender, animal welfare and animal rights and Indigenous approaches to food law, as well as the impacts of global pandemics on food systems. Students who have a keen interest in food law and practice will benefit greatly from this course. However, it is also designed for those more interested in the legal system generally who will learn about its workings through the case study of food and can then apply these insights to other areas of law and policy.
The course objectives are to be able to locate, explain and critique:
They also include developing critical thinking skills and becoming familiar with alternative perspectives.
There have been few changes in Canadian legislation that have had an impact on as many areas of the law as the legalization of cannabis for recreational use. This course, sponsored by Perley-Robertson, Hill & McDougall LLP/s.r.l., will survey the many areas of the law impacted by this unprecedented change and will examine the regulatory framework of cannabis in Canada in respect of both medical and recreational use, and production. In addition, the course will explore some of the potential legal implications of legalization, including with respect to employment/labour law, property law, immigration law and business law. The course features a variety of guest lecturers and instructors from Perley-Robertson, Hill & McDougall LLP/s.r.l. in addition to a visit to Canopy Growth in Smiths Falls.
An internship can be proposed by any student who wishes to further enhance his or her knowledge of a specific area of law while gaining workplace-related skills. The internship proposal must be submitted to the Career and Professional Development Centre (CPDC) for approval. Approval will only be granted if the Section is satisfied that the internship is pedagogically worthwhile for the student and that the organization or individual supervising the student understands its obligation to provide the student with a professional experience which will enhance the student’s legal knowledge and experience. Students must complete 115 hours of unpaid law-related work during a term, typically 1–2 days per week. For more information, please consult the Student-Proposed Internship program page at the Faculty of Law.
You are free to find your own internship opportunities. In addition, CHLPE advertises internships with counsel at The Ottawa Hospital annually. See here for more information on TOH internships.
Students who have completed two terms in law may apply for permission of the Academic Advisor to undertake research and writing in an area of their interest, under a member of the Faculty who agrees to act as supervisor of the research. Permission to enrol in this course will ordinarily be granted only to students who have demonstrated a high level of competence in their law studies. For more information see the Direct Research Project page at the Faculty of Law.
Ce cours vise à expliquer aux étudiants et étudiantes la structure du système de soins de santé au Canada selon une perspective critique. L’objectif est de fournir un cadre d’analyse solide et des outils utiles pour faire de la recherche et exercer dans le domaine tout en examinant les iniquités inhérentes au système et les questions d’accès. Dans cet optique, le cours traite de plusieurs thèmes : le cadre constitutionnel canadien, la santé des populations, l’assurance santé, l'organisation et la réglementation des professions de la santé, la responsabilité professionnelle et des hôpitaux, la santé publique, la santé mentale, les médicaments, les autochtones et la santé, l’accès pour les groupes défavorisés, et les litiges en matière de santé en vertu de la Charte canadienne.
Les étudiants et étudiantes choisissent et analysent un arrêt ou un thème d’actualité portant sur un sujet qui les intéressent particulièrement et présentent le fruit de leur recherche à la classe. Au cours des années précédentes, les sujets suivants ont été explorés : le contrôle des produits du tabac, le système de sang, la procréation médicalement assistée, le consentement aux soins, l’accès à l’avortement, le régime de santé des réfugiés, l’autonomie décisionnelle en fin de la vie, etc.
Ce cours aborde les dispositions de la Charte canadienne des droits et libertés qui sont particulièrement pertinentes dans le contexte de la pandémie de la COVID-19, notamment les articles 32 (application), 7 (vie, liberté, sécurité de sa personne), 15 (égalité), 6 (liberté de circulation), et 1 (limites raisonnables). Le cours examinera des problèmes et litiges tirés de situations actuelles, telles que les exigences d’isolement social; les contrôles imposées sur l’entré au pays de l'étranger; les interdictions en matière de déplacements inter-régionaux et interprovinciaux; l’accès aux soins et aux vaccins; la gestion des risques de la COVID-19 en milieu scolaire et de travail; et les défaillances de santé public en matière de la COVID-19 dans les prisons, les refuges pour personnes sans-abri et victimes de violence, ainsi que les établissements de soins de longue durée, entre autres questions de pointe.
Tout étudiant ou étudiante qui désire approfondir ses connaissances dans un domaine de droit particulier, tout en développant des compétences pratiques en milieu de travail, peut proposer un stage d'études. Le projet de stage doit être présenté au Centre des carrières et du développement professionnel (CCDP) de la Section de common law afin d'obtenir son approbation. Celle-ci ne sera accordée que si la Section est d'avis que le stage d'études est valable pour l'étudiant sur le plan pédagogique et que l'organisation ou l'individu qui dirigera le travail comprend son obligation de fournir à l'étudiant une expérience professionnelle qui lui permettra de parfaire ses connaissances juridiques et son expérience pratique. Les étudiantes et étudiants doivent compléter 115 heures de travail juridique non rémunéré durant un trimestre. En général, les étudiants effectuent leurs heures de stage en y consacrant une journée, une journée et demi ou deux journées par semaine pendant le trimestre. Veuillez consulter le site internet programme de Stages proposés par l’étudiant pour de plus amples renseignements.
You are free to find your own internship opportunities. In addition, CHLPE advertises internships with counsel at The Ottawa Hospital annually. See here for more information on TOH internships.
Les étudiants et étudiantes qui ont complété deux trimestres en droit peuvent, avec l’autorisation du Conseiller aux études, entreprendre une recherche dans un domaine du droit de leur choix et rédiger un rapport sur le sujet, sous la direction d’un professeur ou d’une professeure de la Faculté consentant. En règle générale, la permission ne sera accordée qu’aux étudiants et aux étudiantes qui ont un excellent dossier scolaire en droit. For more information see the Directed Research Project page at the Faculty of Law.
Audrey Ferron Parayre
Ce cours se veut une introduction au droit et politiques de la santé. Portant principalement sur des questions de droit, il permettra toutefois de souligner les liens existants entre le droit, les sciences de la santé et les politiques publiques.
Le cours favorisera une analyse critique et une réflexion approfondie sur des enjeux propres au droit de la santé. Les thèmes suivants pourront être abordés :
Ce cours transversal a pour objet l’étude de la pandémie de COVID-19 au travers ses différents aspects sociojuridiques. Les enseignements permettront d’approfondir les nombreux questionnements sociojuridiques générés par la pandémie, tels les suivants :
Ces questions et plusieurs autres seront discutées dans le cadre de ce cours prodigué par une vaste gamme d’experts œuvrant dans divers domaines du droit pertinents à la pandémie de COVID-19.
Dans le cadre de ce cours, les étudiant·es auront l’opportunité de mettre en perspective les pratiques en droit civil, criminel et administratif et leurs effets sociologiques. Le cours sera divisé en quatre parties. Dans un premier temps : la psychiatrie comme outil de contrôle social; le développement historique du droit psychiatrique; la sur-institutionnalisation et la désinstitutionalisation; quelques pratiques hospitalières actuelles comme les mesures de contrôle (isolement, contentions, substances chimiques) et les électrochocs. Dans un second temps, le droit civil : la garde en établissement et l'autorisation de soins. Dans un troisième temps, le droit criminel : la non-responsabilité pour cause de trouble mentaux; l'incapacité à subir son procès; l'automatisme. Finalement : la Commission d’examen et les tribunaux spécialisés.
Le cours portera principalement sur des questions d'ordre juridique. Toutefois, il sera parfois utiled'établir les liens et les différences qui existent entre l'éthique et le droit. Dans un premier temps, les principes généraux à la base de la relation médecin-patient serontdiscutés. Par la suite, les problèmes spécifiques s'étalant du début à la fin de la vie serontabordés. La procréation médicalement assistée, l'expérimentation, le don d’organe, les soins defin de vie seront notamment étudiés.